Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights

Web Design

Understanding the Principles of User-Centric Design


Creating a user-centric website is, well, quite the daunting task, isnt it? Get more details Web Design Services Near 19935 75a Ave, Langley, BC here. Web Standards Project But, when you dive into the principles of user-centric design, especially with insights from Web Design Langley, youre off to a good start!


First off, understanding your audience is key. Youve gotta put yourself in their shoes (or, should I say, their browsing fingers?). What do they need? What challenges do they face when navigating a website? Its not just about pretty colors and flashy graphics; its about ease of use and intuitive navigation.


Now, lets say youre designing a website for, I dunno, a local bakery. You wouldnt want to clutter the site with unrelated content or confusing menus, right? Thats where simplicity comes in! Users should find what theyre looking for, like a hot loaf of bread, without feeling like theyre solving a puzzle.


And dont even get me started on responsiveness. With so many devices out there (phones, tablets, laptops – you name it!), your websites gotta look good and function well on all of them. Its not just a suggestion, its like, a necessity in todays world!


But heres the trick – while youre making everything user-friendly and accessible, youve got to keep it alluring, too. Ah, the balance! Thats where the art and science of web design play nice together. You want folks to come for the user-friendliness but stay for the oh-so-gorgeous design!


Now, dont forget about feedback. No, Im not talking about that annoying screech from a microphone.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - High-level design

  1. web accessibility
  2. High-level design
  3. web developer
  4. Design language
  5. web engineering
  6. Tableless web design
  7. World Design Organization
  8. .design
  9. Architectural design competition
  10. Content designer
  11. Design engineer
  12. Design Research Society
  13. Design choice
  14. interactive design
  15. Design education
  16. Design closure
  17. web development
  18. Web development
Im talking about listening to your users. Theyre the ones wholl tell you whats working and whats not. And trust me, they wont hold back.


So, there you have it! Creating a user-centric website aint a walk in the park, but with a focus on the users needs, a dash of simplicity, a sprinkle of responsiveness, and a dollop of visually appealing design (and, of course, a listening ear), youll be on your way to success. Just remember, its an ongoing process, not a one-time deal!


And hey! If you ever feel stuck, just reach out to the folks at Web Design Langley. Theyve got the know-how to make your website not just functional but also totally fab. Now, go on and create that user-centric masterpiece (and dont forget to test it, tweak it, and test it again)!

Integrating Web Design Langley Best Practices for Usability


Creating a user-centric website is all about nailing that sweet spot between aesthetics and functionality. When we dive into the world of Web Design Langley, its clear that best practices for usability arent just some fancy buzzwords-theyre the real deal, folks!

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - High-level design

  • Web Design
  • Style sheet (web development)
  • Design pattern
  • Design
  • Web Standards Project
  • Design thinking
  • Design specification
  • Design research
  • Philosophy of design
  • Design brief
  • Design science
  • Design life
  • Design management
  • website builder
  • Work design
Now, let's talk (and not just beat around the bush) about what makes a site truly accessible and engaging.


First off, we cant ignore the elephant in the room: navigation. Its gotta be intuitive, you know? Theres nothing more frustrating than getting lost in a maze of links that dont make sense.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design science

  • World Design Organization
  • .design
  • Architectural design competition
  • Content designer
  • Design engineer
  • Design Research Society
  • Design choice
  • interactive design
  • Design education
  • Design closure
  • web development
  • Web development
  • Design for All
  • Design methods
  • Web standards
  • Web engineering
  • Intelligent design
  • Graphic design occupations
  • Website builder
  • Design research
So, were not gonna do that! Instead, well keep it simple and straightforward.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design management

  1. Architectural design competition
  2. Content designer
  3. Design engineer
  4. Design Research Society
  5. Design choice
  6. interactive design
  7. Design education
  8. Design closure
  9. web development
  10. Web development
  11. Design for All
  12. Design methods
  13. Web standards
  14. Web engineering
  15. Intelligent design
  16. Graphic design occupations
  17. Website builder
  18. Design life
  19. Design management
A clear path means happy visitors (and fewer headaches for everyone involved, am I right?).


Ah, and then theres mobile responsiveness. Listen, if your site isnt playing nice with smartphones and tablets, youre basically waving goodbye to half your audience. Thats a no-go! With Web Design Langley insights, we ensure every pixel looks just as good on a tiny screen as on a big one. No squinting or zooming required-just smooth sailing.


But wait, theres more! Design life Color schemes and fonts-theyre not just there to look pretty. Theyve got a job to do, and thats to make your content pop without causing any eye strain. Think about it; nobodys gonna stick around if theyre rubbing their eyes after two minutes.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Web Standards Project

  • Content designer
  • Design engineer
  • Design Research Society
  • Design choice
  • interactive design
  • Design education
  • Design closure
  • web development
  • Web development
  • Design for All
  • Design methods
  • Web standards
  • Web engineering
  • Intelligent design
  • Graphic design occupations
Well pick a palette thats easy on the eyes and fonts that even your grandma could read without reaching for her glasses.


Interactivity is another piece of the puzzle. Its gotta be like a friendly nudge, not a smack in the face. Subtle animations or a cheeky hover effect? Sure thing! But lets not go overboard with stuff popping up left, right, and center.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design pattern

  • Web engineering
  • Intelligent design
  • Graphic design occupations
  • Website builder
  • web developer
  • Design language
  • web engineering
  • Tableless web design
  • World Design Organization
  • .design
  • Architectural design competition
  • Content designer
  • Design engineer
  • Design Research Society
  • Design choice
  • interactive design
Thats just distracting (and kinda annoying, if you ask me).


Now, lets not forget about content. Its king, they say! But its not just about what you say; its how you say it. Well keep it concise and jargon-free. Nobodys got time for long-winded explanations that go round in circles.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design

  1. Philosophy of design
  2. Design brief
  3. Design science
  4. Design life
  5. Design management
  6. website builder
  7. Work design
  8. Design–build
  9. web accessibility
  10. High-level design
  11. web developer
  12. Design language
  13. web engineering
  14. Tableless web design
  15. World Design Organization
  16. .design
  17. Architectural design competition
Were talking clear, engaging, and to the point.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design life

  1. Website builder
  2. Design science
  3. Design life
  4. Design management
  5. website builder
  6. Work design
  7. Design–build
  8. web accessibility
  9. High-level design
  10. web developer
  11. Design language
  12. web engineering
  13. Tableless web design
  14. World Design Organization
  15. .design
Just like a friendly chat over coffee-except, you know, its on a webpage.


And hey, weve all hit a 404 error at some point, but that doesnt mean we cant make it better. A little humor or a helpful link can turn a minor mishap into a positive experience. Its like saying, "Oops, sorry about that!" with a smile instead of a shrug.


In conclusion, creating a user-centric website with Web Design Langley insights means putting yourself in the shoes of your visitors. Its about making everything so seamless and enjoyable that they dont even notice all the thought that went into it.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design specification

  • web engineering
  • Tableless web design
  • World Design Organization
  • .design
  • Architectural design competition
  • Content designer
  • Design engineer
  • Design Research Society
  • Design choice
  • interactive design
  • Design education
  • Design closure
  • web development
  • Web development
  • Design for All
  • Design methods
  • Web standards
Theyre too busy enjoying your content, finding what they need, and yeah, maybe even having a bit of fun along the way. Now thats what Id call a win-win!

Optimizing Navigation and Content Layout for Better User Experience


When it comes to crafting a user-centric website, theres no denying that Web Design Langley offers some truly insightful nuggets! Its all about striking that perfect balance between aesthetics and functionality, but lets face it, thats no walk in the park.


First off, lets chat about optimizing navigation. Now, I bet youve been on a site where you felt like you needed a map to find anything, right? Ugh, talk about frustrating! The goal here isnt to have folks scratching their heads in confusion; its to guide them smoothly from point A to B. Its gotta be intuitive, like theyre being led by an invisible hand (spooky, but in a good way). And dont even get me started on mobile optimization – if your site's navigation isn't thumb-friendly, you're practically inviting users to bounce.


Then theres the content layout. Oh boy, this is where the magic happens... or doesnt. You see, it's not just about what you say; it's where and how you say it. If your content is jumbled like a toddlers attempt at organizing a bookshelf, no ones gonna stick around to decipher that mess. Break it up with headers, bullet points, and images – give those eyes some rest and the brain a break!


Now, heres a thing (and its a biggie): We cant just slap content wherever and call it a day. Weve got to think about visual hierarchy, making sure the most important bits scream for attention (just dont literally scream, please). And whitespace – its not just empty space; its a breathing room for content, making everything digestible.


But, ah, theres a catch. It aint easy. Sometimes we think weve got it all figured out, but users dont behave like we expect. They zig when we think theyll zag. Thats why testing and tweaking are the names of the game. Weve got to roll up our sleeves, dive into those analytics, and figure out what's working and what's, well, not.


In conclusion (yeah, were wrapping up here), if you want to nail that user experience on your website, youve got to put on your user hat, think like em, and then design like you're the wizard of user-friendliness. Remember, a little clunkiness here, a misstep there, and you could lose em! But keep refining, keep adjusting, and you'll create that seamless, intuitive experience that keeps em coming back for more. After all, in the digital world, it's all about that connection – between your content, your design, and those lovely users. So lets get to it, and make those websites shine with Web Design Langley insight!

Measuring and Enhancing Website Performance Based on User Feedback


When it comes to building a user-centric website, aint nothing more vital than understanding and enhancing site performance based on real, tangible user feedback. I mean, you gotta know whats working (and whats not), right? So, diving into the world of Web Design Langley, we find some pretty insightful stuff on how to measure and, well, jazz up our websites using that gold mine of user opinions.


First off, lets talk measuring. Its not just about the cold, hard stats like page load times or bounce rates, no sir. Its about how users feel when they navigate your site. Do they find what they need without pulling their hair out? Are they clicking around with ease, or are they getting lost in a maze of links? You gotta ask em! Design thinking Style sheet (web development) Surveys, feedback forms, you name it – these tools can give you the lowdown straight from the horses mouth.


But hold on a sec! Its not just about throwing a form on your site and calling it a day. Design You gotta be clever about it. Ask the right questions, at the right time. And when you do get that feedback, dont just sit on it (as tempting as that might be). Analyze it, look for patterns, and, for Petes sake, act on it!


Now, heres the kicker: enhancing your site based on what youve learned. Its a no-brainer that you need to fix whats broken, but you also gotta think outside the box. Maybe your users are screaming for a feature you never even thought of.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design science

  1. Design for All
  2. Design methods
  3. Web standards
  4. Web engineering
  5. Intelligent design
  6. Graphic design occupations
  7. Website builder
  8. Design–build
  9. web accessibility
  10. High-level design
  11. web developer
  12. Design language
  13. web engineering
  14. Tableless web design
  15. World Design Organization
  16. .design
  17. Architectural design competition
  18. Content designer
  19. Design engineer
  20. Design Research Society
Or perhaps theyre telling you, in not so many words, that your designs a bit, well, last decade. Design–build Ouch!


So, you tweak, you adjust, and – voilà – you see the magic happen. Your site starts to shine, your users are happier, and hey, they might even start singing your praises all over the internet! But remember (and this is important), dont rest on your laurels. Design pattern User feedback is an ongoing conversation, not a one-time deal. Keep the lines of communication open, and never stop asking how you can do better.


In conclusion, measuring and enhancing website performance based on user feedback aint just some fancy tech jargon. Its the bread and butter of creating a website that really, truly puts users first. Sure, its a bit of a dance – two steps forward, one step back – but when you get it right, its a beautiful thing to behold! Just remember, nobodys perfect, and thats okay.

Creating a User-Centric Website with Web Design Langley Insights - Design specification

  • Design choice
  • interactive design
  • Design education
  • Design closure
  • web development
  • Web development
  • Design for All
  • Design methods
  • Web standards
  • Web engineering
  • Intelligent design
  • Graphic design occupations
  • Website builder
  • website builder
  • Work design
  • Design–build
Keep listening, keep improving, and your users will thank you for it. After all, isnt that the point?

Top Langley SEO Expert

Entity Name Description Source
Digital marketing Strategies and techniques used to promote products or services online. Source
Search engine optimization The process of improving a website's visibility on search engines. Source
Search engine marketing Marketing strategies aimed at increasing a website's visibility in search engines through paid ads. Source
Local search (optimization) SEO practices focused on improving visibility for local searches. Source
Google A global technology company specializing in Internet-related services and products. Source
Google Maps A web mapping service developed by Google. Source
Audit An examination of records or financial accounts to verify accuracy. Source
Google Search Console A web service by Google that allows webmasters to check indexing status and optimize visibility. Source
Website audit The process of evaluating a website's performance, structure, and SEO. Source
Anchor text The visible, clickable text in a hyperlink. Source
Sitemaps Files that help search engines understand the structure of a website. Source
Web traffic The amount of data sent and received by visitors to a website. Source
Meta element HTML tags that provide metadata about a web page. Source
Pay-per-click An online advertising model where advertisers pay each time their ad is clicked. Source
Web design The process of creating the visual layout and usability of a website. Source

SEO Optimization Langley

The City of Langley, commonly referred to as Langley City, or just Langley, is a municipality in the Metro Vancouver Regional District in British Columbia, Canada. It lies directly east of Surrey, adjacent to the Cloverdale area, and is surrounded elsewhere by the Township of Langley, bordered by its neighbourhoods of Willowbrook to the north, Murrayville to the east, and Brookswood and Fern Ridge to the south.

Citations and other links

(Learn how and when to remove this message)
"SEO" redirects here. For other uses, see Seo (disambiguation).

 

Part of a series on
Internet marketing
Search engine marketing
Display advertising
Affiliate marketing
Misc
 

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.[1][2] SEO targets unpaid search traffic (usually referred to as "organic" results) rather than direct traffic, referral traffic, social media traffic, or paid traffic.

Unpaid search engine traffic may originate from a variety of kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search,[3] news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine results, what people search for, the actual search queries or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by a target audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher within a search engine results page (SERP), with the aim of either converting the visitors or building brand awareness.[4]

History

[edit]

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, webmasters submitted the address of a page, or URL to the various search engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed.[5]

According to a 2004 article by former industry analyst and current Google employee Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits SEO practitioner Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.[6]

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[7][dubious – discuss]

Web content providers also manipulated attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.[8] By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank in search engines and that some webmasters were manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.[9]

By relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.[10]

Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.[citation needed]

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.[11][12] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.[13] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.[14]

Relationship with Google

[edit]

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links.[15] PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.[16] Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design.[17] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[18]

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.[19] The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.[20] Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.[21] In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.[22]

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.[23] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.[24] As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash, and JavaScript.[25]

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[26] On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."[27] Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[28]

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique.[29] The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine.[30] Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links[31] by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words.[32] With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users.[33] In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

[edit]

Getting indexed

[edit]
A simple illustration of the Pagerank algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, Brave Search and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.[34] Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links[35] in addition to their URL submission console.[36] Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;[37] however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.

Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.[38]

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.[39] In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.[40] In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version.[41] In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.[42]

Preventing crawling

[edit]
Main article: Robots exclusion standard

To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[43]

In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint rather than a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.[44]

Increasing prominence

[edit]

A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.[45]

Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element[46] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.[45]

White hat versus black hat techniques

[edit]
Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO.[47] White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.[48]

An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines[11][12][49] are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[50] although the two are not identical.

Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking. Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices.[51] Both companies subsequently apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.[52]

Companies that employ black hat techniques or other spammy tactics can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[53] Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.[54] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google had banned Traffic Power and some of its clients.[55]

As marketing strategy

[edit]

SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator's goals.[editorializing] Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.[56] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's conversion rate.[57][58] In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,[59] which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.[60] Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.[45]

SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.[61] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.[62] It is considered a wise business practice for website operators to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[63] In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user web accessibility has become increasingly important for SEO.

International markets and SEO

[edit]

Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google represented about 75% of all searches.[64] In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and data showed Google was the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.[65] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.[66] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time, there were only about five in Germany.[66] As of March 2024, Google still had a significant market share of 89.85% in Germany.[67] As of June 2008, the market share of Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[68][obsolete source] As of March 2024, Google's market share in the UK was 93.61%.[69]

Successful search engine optimization (SEO) for international markets requires more than just translating web pages. It may also involve registering a domain name with a country-code top-level domain (ccTLD) or a relevant top-level domain (TLD) for the target market, choosing web hosting with a local IP address or server, and using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to improve website speed and performance globally. It is also important to understand the local culture so that the content feels relevant to the audience. This includes conducting keyword research for each market, using hreflang tags to target the right languages, and building local backlinks. However, the core SEO principles—such as creating high-quality content, improving user experience, and building links—remain the same, regardless of language or region.[66]

Regional search engines have a strong presence in specific markets:

  • China: Baidu leads the market, controlling about 70 to 80% market share.[70]
  • South Korea: Since the end of 2021, Naver, a domestic web portal, has gained prominence in the country.[71][72]
  • Russia: Yandex is the leading search engine in Russia. As of December 2023, it accounted for at least 63.8% of the market share.[73]

The Evolution of International SEO

[edit]

By the early 2000s, businesses recognized that the web and search engines could help them reach global audiences. As a result, the need for multilingual SEO emerged.[74] In the early years of international SEO development, simple translation was seen as sufficient. However, over time, it became clear that localization and transcreation—adapting content to local language, culture, and emotional resonance—were far more effective than basic translation.[75]

[edit]

On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."[76][77]

In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.[78][79]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "SEO – search engine optimization". Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Giomelakis, Dimitrios; Veglis, Andreas (April 2, 2016). "Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece". Digital Journalism. 4 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992. ISSN 2167-0811. S2CID 166902013. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  3. ^ Beel, Jöran; Gipp, Bela; Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co" (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.
  4. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  5. ^ Brian Pinkerton. "Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler" (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  6. ^ Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). "Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  7. ^ "The Challenge is Open", Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, November 17, 2020, pp. 189–211, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009, ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0, S2CID 243130517
  8. ^ Pringle, G.; Allison, L.; Dowe, D. (April 1998). "What is a tall poppy among web pages?". Monash University. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  9. ^ Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  10. ^ Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). "Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  11. ^ a b "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  12. ^ a b "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  13. ^ "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  14. ^ ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  15. ^ Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  16. ^ "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  17. ^ Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  18. ^ Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). "Link Spam Alliances" (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  19. ^ Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  20. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  21. ^ Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  22. ^ "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  23. ^ "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  24. ^ "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  25. ^ "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  26. ^ "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  27. ^ "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  28. ^ "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  29. ^ "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  30. ^ Aders, Aaron (June 20, 2012). "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc. Inc.com. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  31. ^ "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  32. ^ "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  33. ^ "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  34. ^ "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  35. ^ "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  36. ^ "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  37. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). "Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  38. ^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  39. ^ "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  40. ^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  41. ^ "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  42. ^ "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  43. ^ "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  44. ^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  45. ^ a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  46. ^ "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  47. ^ Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  48. ^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  49. ^ "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  50. ^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  51. ^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  52. ^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  53. ^ David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  54. ^ Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  55. ^ Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  56. ^ Tapan, Panda (2013). "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  57. ^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  58. ^ "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  59. ^ ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  60. ^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  61. ^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  62. ^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  63. ^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  64. ^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  65. ^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  66. ^ a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  67. ^ "Germany search engine market share 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  68. ^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  69. ^ "UK search engines market share 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  70. ^ "China search engines market share 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  71. ^ cycles, This text provides general information Statista assumes no liability for the information given being complete or correct Due to varying update; Text, Statistics Can Display More up-to-Date Data Than Referenced in the. "Topic: Search engines in South Korea". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  72. ^ "South Korea: main service used to search for information 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  73. ^ "Most popular search engines in Russia 2023". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  74. ^ Arora, Sanjog; Hemrajani, Naveen (September 2023). "A REVIEW ON: MULTILINGUAL SEARCH TECHNIQUE". International Journal of Applied Engineering & Technology. 5 (3): 760–770 – via ResearchGate.
  75. ^ "SEO Starter Guide: The Basics | Google Search Central | Documentation". Google for Developers. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  76. ^ "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  77. ^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  78. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  79. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
[edit]
Listen to this article (22 minutes)
 
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008 (2008-05-20), and does not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help · More spoken articles)
 
 

 

 

Part of a series on
Internet marketing
Search engine marketing
Display advertising
Affiliate marketing
Misc
 

In the field of search engine optimization (SEO), link building describes actions aimed at increasing the number and quality of inbound links to a webpage with the goal of increasing the search engine rankings of that page or website.[1] Briefly, link building is the process of establishing relevant hyperlinks (usually called links) to a website from external sites. Link building can increase the number of high-quality links pointing to a website, in turn increasing the likelihood of the website ranking highly in search engine results. Link building is also a proven marketing tactic for increasing brand awareness.[2]

[edit]
[edit]

Editorial links are the links not acquired from paying money, asking, trading or exchanging. These links are attracted because of the good content and marketing strategies of a website. These are the links that the website owner does not need to ask for as they are naturally given by other website owners.[3]

[edit]

Resource links are a category of links, which can be either one-way or two-way, usually referenced as "Resources" or "Information" in navbars, but sometimes, especially in the early, less compartmentalized years of the Web, simply called "links". Basically, they are hyperlinks to a website or a specific web page containing content believed to be beneficial, useful and relevant to visitors of the site establishing the link.

In recent years, resource links have grown in importance because most major search engines have made it plain that—in Google's words—"quantity, quality, and relevance of links count towards your rating".[4]

Search engines measure a website's value and relevance by analyzing the links to the site from other websites. The resulting “link popularity” is a measure of the number and quality of links to a website. It is an integral part of a website's ranking in search engines. Search engines examine each of the links to a particular website to determine its value. Although every link to a website is a vote in its favor, not all votes are counted equally. A website with similar subject matter to the website receiving the inbound link carries more weight than an unrelated site, and a well-regarded website (such as a university) has higher link quality than an unknown or disreputable website.[5][self-published source?]

The text of links helps search engines categorize a website. The engines' insistence on resource links being relevant and beneficial developed because many artificial link building methods were employed solely to spam search engines, i.e. to "fool" the engines' algorithms into awarding the sites employing these unethical devices undeservedly high page ranks and/or return positions.

Google has cautioned site developers to avoid "free-for-all" links, link-popularity schemes, and the submission of a site to thousands of search engines, given that these tactics are typically useless exercises that do not affect the ranking of a site in the results of the major search engines.[6] For many years now, the major [which?] search engines have deployed technology designed to "red flag" and potentially penalize sites employing such practices.[7]

[edit]

These are the links acquired by the website owner through payment or distribution. They are also known as organically obtained links. Such links include link advertisements, paid linking, article distribution, directory links and comments on forums, blogs, articles and other interactive forms of social media.[8]

[edit]

A reciprocal link is a mutual link between two objects, commonly between two websites, to ensure mutual traffic. For example, Alice and Bob have websites. If Bob's website links to Alice's website and Alice's website links to Bob's website, the websites are reciprocally linked. Website owners often submit their sites to reciprocal link exchange directories in order to achieve higher rankings in the search engines. Reciprocal linking between websites is no longer an important part of the search engine optimization process. In 2005, with their Jagger 2 update, Google stopped giving credit to reciprocal links as it does not indicate genuine link popularity.[9]

Blog and forum comments

[edit]

User-generated content such as blog and forum comments with links can drive valuable referral traffic if it's well-thought-out and pertains to the discussion of the post on the blog.[10] However, these links almost always contain the Nofollow or the newer ugc attribute which signal that Google shouldn't take these into its ranking considerations.[11]

[edit]

Website directories are lists of links to websites which are sorted into categories. Website owners can submit their site to many of these directories. Some directories accept payment for listing in their directory while others are free.

Social bookmarking

[edit]

Social bookmarking is a way of saving and categorizing web pages in a public location on the web. Because bookmarks have anchor text and are shared and stored publicly, they are scanned by search engine crawlers and have search engine optimization value.

Image linking

[edit]

Image linking is a way of submitting images, such as infographics, to image directories and linking them back to a specific URL.

Guest blogging

[edit]

Also known as guest posting, is a popular SEO technique that consists of writing a piece of content for another website with the goal of getting more visibility and possibly link back to the author's website. According to Google, such links are considered unnatural and should be generally containing the Nofollow attribute.[12]

[edit]

In early incarnations, when Google's algorithm relied on incoming links as an indicator of website success, Black Hat SEOs manipulated website rankings by creating link-building schemes, such as building subsidiary websites to send links to a primary website. With an abundance of incoming links, the prime website outranked many reputable sites. However, the conflicts of being devalued by major search engines while building links could be caused by web owners using other black hat strategies. Black hat link building refers explicitly to the process of acquiring as many links as possible with minimal effort.

The Penguin algorithm was created to eliminate this type of abuse. At the time, Google clarified its definition of a "bad" link: “Any links intended to manipulate a site’s ranking in Google search results may be considered part of a link scheme.”

With Penguin, it wasn't the quantity of links that improved a site's rankings but the quality. Since then, Google's web spam team has attempted to prevent the manipulation of their search results through link building. Major brands including J.C. Penney, BMW, Forbes, Overstock.com, and many others have received severe penalties to their search rankings for employing spammy and non-user friendly link building tactics.[13]

On October 5, 2014, Google launched a new algorithm update Penguin 3.0 to penalize those sites who use black hat link building tactics to build unnatural links to manipulate search engines. The update affected 0.3% English Language queries all over the world.[14]

Black hat SEO could also be referred to as Spamdexing, which utilizes other black SEO strategies and link building tactics.[15] Some black hat link building strategies include getting unqualified links from and participating in Link farm, link schemes and Doorway page.[6] Black Hat SEO could also refer to "negative SEO," the practice of deliberately harming another website's performance.

[edit]

White hat link building strategies are those strategies that add value to end users, abide by Google's term of service and produce good results that could be sustained for a long time. White hat link building strategies focus on producing high-quality as well as relevant links to the website. Although more difficult to acquire, white hat link building tactics are widely implemented by website owners because such kind of strategies are not only beneficial to their websites' long-term developments but also good to the overall online environment.

See also

[edit]
  • Deep linking: linking directly to a page within another website.
  • Inline linking: linking directly to content within another website.
  • Internal link: linking directly to content within your own website.
  • Overlinking
  • PageRank: an algorithm used by Google Search to rank websites in their search engine results.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Link Building Strategies You Need to Know | SEJ". searchenginejournal. Retrieved 10 February 2017.
  2. ^ Bailey, Matt (2011). Internet marketing : an hour a day (1st ed.). Indianapolis, Ind.: Wiley Technology Publishing. pp. 83–84. ISBN 978-0470633748. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  3. ^ Rognerud, Jon (2011). Ultimate Guide to Search Engine Optimization Drive Traffic, Boost Conversion Rates, and Make Lots of Money (2nd ed.). New York: Entrepreneur Press. p. 213. ISBN 978-1613080207. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  4. ^ "Link schemes" Google webmaster central
  5. ^ Oxer, Jonathan (2007). How to build a website and stay sane (2nd ed.). Lulu.com. p. 134. ISBN 978-1847997340. Retrieved 2 December 2014.[self-published source]
  6. ^ a b "Search Engine Optimization (SEO)" Google webmaster central
  7. ^ "Is That Directory Link Unnatural? | Search Engine Watch". searchenginewatch.com. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
  8. ^ Jerkovic, John I. (2010). SEO Warrior. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc. p. 17. ISBN 978-1449383077. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  9. ^ Webster, Ken. "Google's Jagger Update – Dust Begins to Settle?". WebProNews. iEntry Network. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  10. ^ Hines, Kristi. "How to Use Blog Commenting to Get Valuable Backlinks". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  11. ^ "Evolving "nofollow" – new ways to identify the nature of links". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  12. ^ Southern, Matt (10 April 2020). "Google Answers: Is It OK to Link to My Own Guest Post?". Search Engine Journal. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  13. ^ "10 Big Brands That Were Penalized By Google, From Rap Genius To The BBC". Marketing Land. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
  14. ^ Matt McGee. "Google Penguin Update 3 Released, Impacts 0.3% Of English-Language Queries", Retrieved on 17 February 2016.
  15. ^ Frick, Tim (2013). Return on Engagement: Content, Strategy and Design Techniques for Digital Marketing. Taylor & Francis. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-1136030260. Retrieved 3 December 2014.
[edit]
 

 

Langley may refer to:

People

[edit]

Places

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

Canada

[edit]

France

[edit]

United Kingdom

[edit]

United States

[edit]

Schools

[edit]

Other uses

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Check our other pages :

Frequently Asked Questions

Small World Marketing ensures your data's privacy and security by implementing cutting-edge encryption and following strict data protection regulations. They constantly update their AI systems to prevent unauthorized access and safeguard your information.

Yes, you'll receive ongoing maintenance and support services after your initial web design project is done. They ensure your site stays up-to-date and runs smoothly, addressing any issues that may arise post-launch.

You'll find that AI approaches to web design can significantly reduce costs compared to traditional methods. The automation and efficiency AI provides streamline the design process, making it faster and more cost-effective for you.

Yes, Small World Marketing's AI-powered solutions can seamlessly integrate with your existing digital marketing tools and platforms, enhancing your business's online presence in Langley without the need to overhaul your current digital marketing strategy.

You're wondering how they keep up-to-date with AI advancements for their web design services. They likely attend tech conferences, collaborate with AI experts, and continuously research to integrate the latest innovations into their offerings.

To find out the initial costs of hiring Small World Marketing for web design services, you'd need to contact them directly. Prices vary based on your project's complexity and specific requirements.

You'd find they measure success by analyzing traffic increases, conversion rates, customer engagement, and feedback. They'll also track how the website's performance impacts your overall business goals, ensuring the design aligns with your aspirations.

Yes, they can provide ongoing support and updates for your website after the initial design is complete. You'll get continuous assistance to ensure your site remains up-to-date and performs well over time.

You'll find that they're flexible, working with businesses outside of Langley and across various industries. They adapt their approach to meet specific needs, ensuring your project receives the attention and expertise it deserves.

Small World Marketing encourages you to be involved throughout the web design process. They value your input and make sure you're part of the decision-making, ensuring the final product truly represents your vision.

Small World Marketing picks businesses based on their unique needs and market potential in Langley. They don't limit themselves to specific industries or sizes, focusing instead on who they can help succeed the most.

You're wondering about the cost of Small World Marketing's services. They provide various pricing models and flexible payment options tailored for small businesses, ensuring affordability without compromising on the quality of their web design and digital marketing.

You're in luck! Small World Marketing isn't limited to just Langley; they can assist businesses anywhere, expanding their cutting-edge web design services beyond local boundaries. So, no matter your location, they've got you covered.

Small World Marketing tracks your web design's performance using analytics, regularly updating you with reports on traffic, engagement, and conversion rates. They'll adjust strategies based on this data to ensure your digital marketing success.

Yes, Small World Marketing provides training and resources for you to manage your website and digital marketing efforts on your own after the initial setup, ensuring you're well-equipped to handle basic needs independently.